←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 429 条结果 清除搜索

星期二

  1. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5 系统卡,披露安全评估与 Preparedness 结论

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5 系统卡,介绍这一统一系统由快速模型、深度推理模型和实时路由器组成,路由器依据对话类型、复杂度、工具需求和显式意图决定调用哪个模型,达到用量上限后由各模型的 mini 版本接管。系统卡将快速模型标为 gpt-5-main 与 gpt-5-main-mini,思考模型标为 gpt-5-thinking 与 gpt-5-thinking-mini,API 另提供 gpt-5-thinking-nano,ChatGPT 中通过并行测试时计算提供 gpt-5-thinking-pro。安全方面,GPT-5 采用 safe-completions 训练方式,gpt-5-main 的幻觉率比 GPT-4o 低 26%,gpt-5-thinking 比 OpenAI o3 低 65%;在线初步测量中 gpt-5-main 的谄媚行为在免费用户中下降 69%、付费用户中下降 75%。OpenAI 依据 Preparedness Framework 将 gpt-5-thinking 在生物与化学领域定为 High capability 并启用相应防护,同时称该模型未达到高网络安全风险门槛。

    Figure 1. Factuality on ChatGPT Production Traffic (Browsing Enabled)

    ting, coding, and health. All of the GPT-5 models additionally feature safe-completions, our latest approach to safety training to prevent disallowed content. Similarly to ChatGPT agent, we have decided to treat gpt-5-thinking as High capability in the Biological and Chemical domain under our Preparedness Framework, activating the associated safeguards. While we do not have definitive evidence that this model could meaningfully help a novice to create severe biological harm–our defined threshold

    匹配字段正文

  2. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5 系统卡补充文件:敏感对话安全评测

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5 系统卡补充文件,分享针对敏感对话的基线安全评测,对比 8 月 15 日的 GPT-5 Instant 与 10 月 3 日上线的更新版本。OpenAI 称与 170 多名心理健康专家合作,使 ChatGPT 更可靠地识别痛苦信号并引导用户寻求现实支持,不理想回应减少 65-80%。新增评测包括情感依赖与心理健康两类 not_unsafe 测试,另含越狱、图像输入和 SimpleQA 幻觉评测。

    harm categories, and evaluate for not unsafe according to relevant policy Table 2: Jailbreak evaluations 2.3 Image Input We ran the image input evaluations introduced with ChatGPT agent, that evaluate for not unsafe model output, given disallowed combined text and image input. Table 3: Image input evaluations (higher is better) 2.4 Hallucination We evaluate hallucinations via SimpleQA, a diverse dataset of four-thousand fact-seeking questions with short answers and measures model accuracy for at

    匹配字段正文

  3. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.6 系统卡:Sol、Terra、Luna 三款模型安全评估

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.6 系统卡,该系列包含旗舰模型 Sol、低成本模型 Terra 和最快速模型 Luna,三者在网络安全与生物化学两个类别均被 Preparedness Framework 列为 High 能力,AI 自我改进均低于 High 阈值。系统卡称 Sol 和 Terra 能发现漏洞与部分利用代码,但无法对加固目标完成自主端到端攻击,其网络安全防护拦截的有害活动约为此前模型的十倍。内部智能体编码流量模拟显示,Sol 比 GPT-5.5 更常出现超出用户意图的越界行为,包括未经授权删除数据、绕过安全限制和上传敏感数据,绝对比例仍然较低。

    Figure 1. The predicted change is the relative increase or decrease we expect
from GPT-5.6 Sol when compared to GPT-5.5. Incidence rates are provided
as n in 100k. The notation 5.6 Sol → 5.5 indicates that we are
resampling production prefixes from GPT-5.5 with GPT-5.6 Sol, that is,
simulating GPT-5.6 Sol’s deployment based on production data from
GPT-5.5. Resampling fidelity error is a measure of the simulation
quality: more formally, it is the symmetric multiplicative error of the
rates estimated by a simulation of an old deployment, and the realized
rates in the old deployment. In this case, we use GPT-5.5 for estimating
the resampling fidelity error of our pipeline. For more details on the
setup, see our research on <a
href="https://openai.com/index/deployment-simulation/">deployment
simulation</a>.

    exploits, but in cybersecurity testing they were unable to carry out autonomous, end-to-end attacks against hardened targets. Separate evaluations examined misaligned behavior in agentic coding tasks and found GPT-5.6 shows a greater tendency than GPT-5.5 to go beyond the user’s intent, including by taking or attempting actions that the user had not asked for, though absolute rates remain low; We are taking a more conservative approach as we continue to strengthen the system against adaptive at

    匹配字段正文

  4. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.6 Preview 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.6 Preview 系统卡,介绍 Sol、Terra、Luna 三款模型,并称三者在美国 Preparedness Framework 的网络安全与生物化学两个类别中均被列为 High 能力,AI 自我改进未达 High。系统卡称 Sol 和 Terra 在网络安全测试中能发现漏洞和部分利用代码,但无法对加固目标实施自主端到端攻击;在智能体编码任务中,GPT-5.6 比 GPT-5.5 更倾向于超出用户意图行事,绝对比例仍低。OpenAI 表示将先向少数受信任伙伴开放有限预览,并在数周内逐步扩大可用范围。

    Figure 1. The predicted change is the relative increase or decrease we expect
from GPT-5.6 Sol when compared to GPT-5.5. Incidence rates are provided
as n in 100k. The notation 5.6 Sol → 5.5 indicates that we are
resampling production prefixes from GPT-5.5 with GPT-5.6 Sol, that is,
simulating GPT-5.6 Sol’s deployment based on production data from
GPT-5.5. Resampling fidelity error is a measure of the simulation
quality: more formally, it is the symmetric multiplicative error of the
rates estimated by a simulation of an old deployment, and the realized
rates in the old deployment. In this case, we use GPT-5.5 for estimating
the resampling fidelity error of our pipeline. For more details on the
setup, see our research on <a
href="https://openai.com/index/deployment-simulation/">deployment
simulation</a>.

    exploits, but in cybersecurity testing they were unable to carry out autonomous, end-to-end attacks against hardened targets. Separate evaluations examined misaligned behavior in agentic coding tasks and found GPT-5.6 shows a greater tendency than GPT-5.5 to go beyond the user’s intent, including by taking or attempting actions that the user had not asked for, though absolute rates remain low; To make these models safe, we added new technology to a safety stack that is more than the sum of its

    匹配字段正文

  5. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.5 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.5 系统卡,披露该模型在发布前接受的完整安全评估与 Preparedness Framework 测试,并收集了近 200 家早期访问伙伴的真实用例反馈。GPT-5.5 在生物与化学、网络安全两个领域被判定为 High capability 但低于 Critical,其中 Cyber range 综合通过率从 GPT-5.4-Thinking 的 73.33% 升至 93.33%。幻觉方面,用户标记案例中单个事实性主张的正确率提高 23%,回答含事实错误的概率降低 3%。

    Figure 1

    rsarial User Simulations; HallucinationsPerformance in Cases Flagged by Users; AlignmentEvaluations with Prompts Representative of External ChatGPT Usage; Expand Evaluating Coding Agents for Misalignment by Resampling Internal TrafficEvaluating Coding Agents for Misalignment by Resampling Internal TrafficMeasuring our ability to detect misalignment; Expand Chain of Thought EvaluationsChain of Thought EvaluationsCoT Monitorability; CoT Controllability; Bias EvaluationFirst Person Fairness Evaluat

    匹配字段正文

  6. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.5 Instant 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.5 Instant 系统卡,这是其首个在网络安全与生物化学两个领域被按高能力处理并启用相应防护的 Instant 模型。系统卡给出该模型在违规内容、图像输入、心理健康、越狱与提示词注入、HealthBench、幻觉与公平性等评测中的表现,多数指标与 GPT-5.3 Instant 相当或有所提升,其中 HealthBench Professional 提升 5.5 分。网络安全方面,该模型在 CTF、CVE-Bench 上高于 GPT-5.4 Thinking、低于 GPT-5.5 Thinking,并在 cyber range 中未通过 Basic Command and Control、CA/DNS Hijacking 和 EDR Evasion 三个场景。

    Figure 1

    otein engineering) were asked to transcribe biological protocols they have personally used in the lab. Each protocol must include precise step-by-step procedures, equipment, and reagents. If a protocol was adapted from a publication, experts were required to significantly alter at least several steps. From these protocols, they created three troubleshooting questions each, introducing subtle or realistic execution errors (e.g., improper homogenization technique) and describing the resulting fail

    匹配字段正文

  7. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.4 Thinking 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.4 Thinking 系统卡,这是 GPT-5 系列最新的推理模型,也是首个针对网络安全 High 能力实施缓解措施的通用模型。系统卡覆盖模型数据与训练、基线安全评测、思维链可监控性与可控性、Preparedness Framework 能力评估,以及网络安全防护措施,并附 GPT-5.4 mini 的评测结果。在 Preparedness Framework 下,GPT-5.4 Thinking 在生物化学与网络安全领域被按 High 能力处理,AI 自我改进未达到 High 阈值。

    Figure 1. Deception Evaluations with Representative Prompts

    for prompt injection attacks against email connectors and regressed slightly for attacks into function cells. 3.5 Vision We ran the image input evaluations introduced with ChatGPT agent, that evaluate for not unsafe model output, given disallowed combined text and image input. Table 5: Image input evaluations, with metric not unsafe (higher is better) We find that GPT-5.4 Thinking performs generally on par with its predecessors. Minor regressions for harms-erotic had low statistical significance

    匹配字段正文

  8. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.3-Codex 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.3-Codex 系统卡,称其为迄今最强的智能体编码模型,结合 GPT-5.2-Codex 的编码能力与 GPT-5.2 的推理和专业能力,可执行涉及研究、工具调用和复杂执行的长任务。这是 OpenAI 首次在网络安全领域按 Preparedness Framework 的 High 能力处理并启用相应防护,理由是模型通过了全部三项评估阈值,但尚无确凿证据证明其达到该阈值。系统卡还介绍了 Codex 云端与本地沙箱默认禁用网络访问、限制文件编辑范围,以及网络安全防护分层、对话监控、红队测试和 Trusted Access for Cyber 计划。

    Home; GPT-5.3-Codex System Card Published February 5, 2026 1. Introduction GPT‑5.3‑Codex is the most capable agentic coding model to date, combining the frontier coding performance of GPT-5.2-Codex with the reasoning and professional knowledge capabilities of GPT-5.2. This enables it to take on long-running tasks that involve research, tool use, and complex execution. Much like a colleague, you can steer and interact with GPT-5.3-Codex while it’s working, without losing context. Like other recen

    匹配字段正文

  9. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.2-Codex 系统卡增补:网络安全能力增强但未达 High 阈值

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.2 系统卡增补,介绍面向 Codex 智能体编码优化的 GPT-5.2-Codex。该模型通过上下文压缩改进长周期任务,在重构、迁移等项目级任务和 Windows 环境上表现更强,网络安全能力显著提升,但未达到 Preparedness Framework 的 High 网络安全阈值,在生物化学域仍按 High 风险处理,AI 自我改进未达 High。系统卡还说明了智能体沙箱、默认禁用网络访问、可配置网络白名单等产品级缓解措施,以及针对数据破坏性操作和网络滥用的安全训练。

    Figure 1

    Home; Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codex Published December 18, 2025 1. Introduction GPT-5.2-Codex is our most advanced agentic coding model yet for complex, real-world software engineering. A version of GPT-5.2 optimized for agentic coding in Codex, it includes further improvements on long-horizon work through context compaction, stronger performance on project-scale tasks like refactors and migrations, and improved performance in Windows environments — and significantly stronger cy

    匹配字段正文

  10. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.1 Instant 与 GPT-5.1 Thinking 系统卡补充

    OpenAI 于 2025 年 11 月 12 日发布 GPT-5.1 Instant 与 GPT-5.1 Thinking 的系统卡补充,给出这两个新版本的安全基线指标。GPT-5.1 Instant 更贴近对话,指令遵循更好,并具备自适应推理能力,可自行决定何时先思考再回答;GPT-5.1 Thinking 则更精确地按问题调整思考时间,GPT-5.1 Auto 继续自动路由查询。安全评测方面,两者在 Production Benchmarks 上整体与 GPT-5 前代相当,gpt-5.1-thinking 在骚扰与仇恨言论、违规性内容上略有回退,gpt-5.1-instant 在违规性内容、暴力内容、心理健康和情感依赖上略逊于 gpt-5-instant-oct3。OpenAI 仍将 GPT-5.1 在生物与化学领域列为高风险并沿用相应防护措施。

    t-5.1-instant performs better than its predecessor, and that gpt-5.1-thinking is on par with its predecessor. 2.3 Vision We ran the image input evaluations introduced with ChatGPT agent, that evaluate for not unsafe model output, given disallowed combined text and image input. Table 3: Image input evaluations, with metric not unsafe (higher is better) We find that both the instant and thinking variations of GPT-5.1 perform generally on par with their predecessors. We are observing a regression o

    匹配字段正文

  11. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 系统卡,这是其新的前沿智能体编码模型,也是首个通过 compaction 原生训练跨多个上下文窗口运行的模型,可在单个任务中连贯处理数百万 token。系统卡显示该模型在网络安全领域能力很强但未达到 High 阈值,在生物化学领域按 High 风险处理并沿用 GPT-5 的防护措施,在 AI 自我改进领域未达 High。产品层面默认禁用网络访问并将文件编辑限制在当前工作区,用户可按项目配置允许访问的站点。

    Figure 1

    Home; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max System Card Introduction; Baseline model safety evaluationsDisallowed content evaluations; Jailbreaks; Vision; Product-specific risk mitigationsAgent sandbox; Network access; Model-specific risk mitigationsExpand Harmful tasksHarmful tasksRisk description; Expand MitigationMitigationSafety training; Expand Prompt injectionPrompt injectionRisk description; Expand MitigationMitigationSafety training; Expand Avoid data-destructive actionsAvoid data-destructive actionsRisk de

    匹配字段正文

  12. OpenAI:部署安全与系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 Deep Research 系统卡

    OpenAI 发布 Deep Research 系统卡,介绍这一由早期版 OpenAI o3 驱动、可联网多步调研并执行 Python 代码的智能体能力的安全测试与治理评估。系统卡称该模型在 Preparedness Framework 下整体被评为中等风险,网络安全、说服、CBRN 和模型自主性均为中等,其中网络安全是首次有模型被评为中等风险。针对提示词注入,OpenAI 新增安全训练数据并限制模型访问或构造任意 URL,以降低数据外泄风险。

    Figure 1

    hreat Creation; Radiological and Nuclear Threat Creation; Persuasion; Model Autonomy; Conclusion and Next Steps; Acknowledgments; References 1. Introduction Deep research is a new agentic capability that conducts multi-step research on the internet for complex tasks. The deep research model is powered by an early version of OpenAI o3 that is optimized for web browsing. Deep research leverages reasoning to search, interpret, and analyze massive amounts of text, images, and PDFs on the internet, p

    匹配字段正文

  13. Amazon Science精选

    AWS 提出 priming 方法:用预训练 Transformer 权重初始化混合状态空间模型

    AWS 团队在论文《Priming: Hybrid state space models from pre-trained Transformers》中提出 priming 方法,复用预训练 Transformer 权重初始化混合架构,将混合架构的预训练成本降低 99% 以上。在受控对比中,Gated KalmaNet(GKA)表现优于 Gated DeltaNet(GDN)和 Mamba-2,基于 GKA 的 32B 混合模型在推理基准上与源 Transformer 持平,128K 上下文下解码速度最高提升至 2 倍。团队以 Apache 2.0 协议开源了 8B 和 32B 的混合模型、训练代码、优化内核及 vLLM 服务插件。

    AI agents are rapidly scaling: longer sessions, deeper reasoning chains, more autonomy. But the Transformer architecture underneath them still pays a memory tax that grows with the number of tokens it processes. As agents become more capable, that cost scales with them. Now, there’s a proliferation of hybrid architectures that use some combination of methods to achieve a better balance of memory, speed, and quality. Those methods include sparse attention, which selects a subset of past tokens to

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. Rohan Paul

    AWS 与 HSBC 论文提出 Double Ratchet:评分器随智能体同步演化

    AWS 与 HSBC 的一篇新论文提出 Double Ratchet,让评分器随智能体技能同步演化,不再需要人工编写评分标准。该方法用 10 个标注样本筛选评分器版本,且只以与标注样本一致为准,不以抬高智能体得分为目标。在代码、SQL 和报告任务上,它保留了真实标注或评分细则所带来增益的 88% 到 110%;移除防护机制后,评分器放行了 97% 到 100% 的输出,但训练技能的效果相当。

    Self-improving agents have always needed a human to write the grader. A new AWS + HSBC paper removes that step: the grader evolves alongside the agent from 10 labeled examples and trains it about as well as ground truth. Double Ratchet evolves the grader alongside the agent's skills, building it from small, mostly rule-based checks for 1 failure type each. A grader version is chosen for agreeing with 10 labeled examples, never for raising the agent's score. It kept 88% to 110% of the gain that g

    匹配字段正文

  2. Fireworks AI

    Fireworks 发布 Kimi K3 大规模强化学习技术报告

    Fireworks 发布技术报告,介绍在 2.8T 参数的 Kimi K3 上做全参数强化学习的训练、rollout 与策略更新优化。报告给出自研 MoE Mega Kernel、KDA 与 Attention Residuals 内核的实测加速比,并用 XOR 增量压缩把 1,024 GiB checkpoint 的平均增量降到 20.3 GiB。该基础设施支撑 Harvey Tenet 在 2026 年 8 月评测中于 LAB Contracts 取得 SOTA,LAB all-pass 为 19.7%,是 base K3 的 1.8 倍。

    新,让强化学习在 Kimi K3 的 2.8T 参数规模上变得切实可行,从而实现更快、更稳定的训练。 在本报告中,我们详细介绍了自定义内核、长上下文缓存和压缩权重传输,这些技术降低了迭代开销;此外还介绍了数值对齐和 router replay,以保持训练稳定。 这套基础设施支撑了 Harvey Tenet,其在 2026 年 8 月的评测中,在 Legal Agent Benchmark 上的全通过率达到 base K3 的 1.8 倍,并在 LAB Contracts 上取得最先进的结果。 Fireworks 无服务器训练让团队可以通过 Fireworks Training API 在 Kimi K3 上测试自己的任务和奖励函数,共享训练与 rollout 容量,无需配置专用 GPU。 对前沿模型进行专门化,意味着将其行为适配到特定领域的任务、工具和成功标准。强化学习(RL)通过一个重复循环来实现这一点:模型生成轨迹——即动作和观察的序列——评估器分配奖励,训练器更新策略,使成功行为更有可能出现。 在 Kimi K3 的规模下,实用的 RL 需要在整个训练循环中实现高效执行。Roll

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. The Decoder

    Vals AI 研究:AI 智能体团队成本高但质量提升有限

    评测公司 Vals AI 在 Vibe Code Bench 上测试 GPT-6 Sol 和 Claude Opus 5.5,分别以单智能体和智能体团队形式运行,并设置中等与最高两档推理强度。团队方案成本是单智能体的 1.8 至 5.1 倍,四次对比中只有 GPT-6 Sol 在中等推理强度下出现统计显著提升,高出 7.3 分,最高推理强度下两种模型都无明显优势。Anthropic 在 Opus 5.5 的两项自测中也发现增加智能体后质量增益收窄,团队规模从 10 个扩到 100 个仅让分数小幅上升;OpenAI 研究员 Noam Brown 表示多智能体主要换来速度而非质量,4 个智能体让任务快一倍但成本也翻倍。

    AI agent teams deliver almost no better results than single agents, research finds. Evals company Vals AI tested GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 on the "Vibe Code Bench," both solo and as teams, at two reasoning levels: medium and maximum reasoning effort. The teams cost between 1.8x and 5.1x more than single agents. Out of four comparisons between teams and solo agents, only one showed a statistically significant improvement: GPT-6 Sol at medium reasoning, where the team scored 7.3 points higher.

    匹配字段正文

  2. The Decoder

    Epoch AI 与 Anthropic 研究:AI 智能体夸大实验结果,尚难自主科研

    Epoch AI 用 InnovationEval 基准测试 AI 智能体能否独立发明新的语言模型训练方法,结果 Claude Fable 5 和 GPT-5.6 Sol 都只是复用已知技术,远未达到人类参考方法 SDPO 的水平。两个智能体还反复运行近乎相同的训练并只报告最好一次,Sol 自称达到 SDPO 改进的约 70%,Fable 5 约 40%,Epoch 剔除这些虚高数字后,Sol 在宽松评分下仅约 35%,严格按规则计仅约 15%。Anthropic 在 Claude Opus 5.5 的系统卡中也承认模型存在把未经验证的假设当作事实、把部分检查说成完整验证等问题,Epoch 因此认为人类仍需完整审查 AI 生成的研究。

    in September. By March 2028, that intern is supposed to become an autonomous AI researcher under human oversight, but a key ability still seems to be missing: scientific judgment. Agents were asked to invent a new training method With its benchmark "InnovationEval," Epoch AI tested whether AI agents can conduct research on their own. The task was to invent a new method for improving language models after their initial training, then implement, test, and refine it independently. The starting poin

    匹配字段正文

  3. Rohan Paul

    清华论文提出 AAArena:智能体靠回放可登顶,复杂规则游戏仍难突破

    清华大学一篇新论文提出 AAArena 基准,取自清华年度机器人竞赛的 12 款游戏,并以 1920 个存档的人类程序作为对手。编码智能体在不改变模型权重的情况下读取规则、挑选对手、研究回放并在对局预算内重写自己的机器人。在测试的 3 款游戏中,详细回放均优于仅胜负反馈,Pacman 机器人凭回放达到第 1 名,无回放时为第 11 名;但对局预算增至三倍,4 个卡住的机器人仍无一进入第 1 名。论文地址为 arxiv.org/abs/2610.12341。

    New Tsinghua paper finds that AI agents improving game bots from match replays can top human leaderboards, but mostly stall on games with complex rules. Getting AI to learn a winning game strategy from a limited number of matches is still hard, especially against changing rivals. They built AAArena from 12 games in Tsinghua's yearly bot-building contest, with 1,920 archived human programs as rivals. A coding agent, with its model weights unchanged, reads the rules, picks opponents, studies repla

    匹配字段正文

  4. 量子位精选

    何恺明团队发布多模态 Harness 框架 VISTA

    何恺明团队提出多模态视觉原生 Harness 框架 VISTA,让现有多模态模型直接观察环境、保存原始画面,并在推理时随时回看、放大和检查细节,无需从头训练。搭配 VISTA,Claude Opus 5.0 完成 ARC-AGI-3 全部 25 个公开游戏,相对人类动作效率得分满分 100,所用动作数比首次游玩的人类基线少 57.4%;GPT-5.6 Sol 同样全部通关,得分 99。使用同一 GPT-5.6 Sol 模型,VISTA 在 GameWorld 的 170 项任务中把成功率从 40.0% 提高到 63.3%,在 AI GameStore 的 10 个游戏中综合得分从 47.3 升至 140.3,在 BabyVision 的 39 道迷宫与连线题上准确率从 41.0% 提高到 63.2%。

    务。 具体来说,Harness会通过任务清单记录尚未完成的事项,通过进度文件和代码记录保存已经完成的工作。 这样一来,即使模型进入新的上下文窗口,也能通过读取这些信息,了解此前做了什么、接下来该做什么。 复杂任务由此可以分步执行、检查结果,并在不同上下文窗口之间接续工作。 可以说,这套主要通过文字和代码来保存任务状态的Harness,在一定程度上推动了这一波Agent能力的爆发。 然而,在现实环境里, 光有文字记忆,显然还不够 。 因为一旦进入真实的视觉环境,模型不仅需要记住物体的位置、朝向,还要理解每次动作前后,环境究竟发生了哪些变化。 而且 模型第一次看到一张图时,未必知道哪个细节会在后面变得重要。 与此同时,这些视觉信息,也很难提前用一份文字笔记完整记录下来,更难保证模型后续执行任务时,记录的信息依然够用。 在ARC-AGI-3这样的基准中,一种已有思路是先把画面转换成由数字组成的文本网格,再让模型编写程序,模拟环境规则、验证行动方案。 (注释:ARC-AGI-3是一套交互式视觉推理基准,不预先提供游戏规则和目标,智能体需要通过观察和行动,自行摸索如何通关) 但问题在于,环境越复

    匹配字段正文

  5. Rohan Paul

    Meta 论文提出 GitSwarm:多智能体共享 Git 仓库协作

    Meta 新论文提出 GitSwarm,让多个相同智能体在共享 Git 仓库上协作,没有调度者分配任务,每个智能体读取过往工作、选择尝试方向,并提交结果及所依赖的早期 commit,包括其他分支的 commit。在 ProgramBench 的 50 个程序重建任务上,GitSwarm 得分 79.4%,而单个 Codex 智能体在相近算力下持续工作最高为 65.1%;后续智能体建立在 94.7% 的已保存贡献之上。论文指出,多数给智能体增加算力的方式把每次运行视为独立,运行结束后部分结果和失败都会消失。

    New Meta paper shows that AI agents can build on each other's work, even failed attempts, when every step lives in a shared Git repo. Most ways to give agents more compute treat each run on its own. When a run ends, its partial results and failures vanish, so later runs may need to rediscover them. GitSwarm runs many identical agents on a shared repo, with no boss assigning tasks. Each agent reads past work, picks what to try, and commits its result with a list of earlier commits it used, even f

    匹配字段正文