←搜索结果

按匹配度 · 共 404 条结果 清除搜索

星期五

  1. NVIDIA Developer · Generative AI精选

    NVIDIA AI Red Team 总结部署更安全 AI 智能体的四种方式

    NVIDIA AI Red Team 在六个月内评估了多个 AI 智能体,归纳出四类反复出现的失效模式:缺少访问控制、工具允许任意代码执行、缺少网络出口控制、密钥以明文暴露。团队指出基于提示词的护栏和 LLM-as-a-judge 模式常被社会工程、渐进式操纵和恶意包安装等合法工作流绕过,有效防护需要模型控制面之外的确定性控制,包括严格访问控制、Docker 或 NVIDIA OpenShell 等加固沙箱、默认拒绝的网络出口以及通过专用密钥管理器让密钥远离智能体。

    I / Cybersecurity English 中文 The NVIDIA AI Red Team shares how access controls, sandboxing, network egress restrictions, and secret management can reduce the risks of deploying AI agents at enterprise scale. AI-Generated Summary The NVIDIA AI Red Team assessed multiple AI agents over the past six months and identified four recurring failure modes: lack of access control, tools enabling arbitrary code execution, missing network egress controls, and secrets exposed in plaintext. Prompt-based guard

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Figma AI / Agent / Make

    Figma 如何用智能体守护内部系统安全

    Figma 安全工程团队公开了其内部安全智能体系统,用 RAG 检索历史告警与调查上下文,再由 Tines 上的智能体调用 Okta、Wiz、Slack、Panther 等工具完成告警分诊,并可查询安全数据湖、提交修复 PR。团队称复杂告警的解决时间缩短约 70%,值班呼叫量因 AI 驱动的严重度降级减少 20%,端点软件审批请求减少 25%。系统将记忆分为案例记忆、引导记忆和过程记忆三层,并用确定性护栏限制智能体行为,例如所有 PR 自动设为草稿。

    A split-background abstract illustration. The left side is black with a blue diamond, an orange floral motif, scattered orange squares, and bold graphic accents in magenta and olive green. The right side is teal with stacked horizontal pill shapes in orange, blush pink, and dark teal, punctuated by small blue and pink circles.

    Inside Figma; Engineering; Security Our security team built an AI agent that triages alerts, conducts forensic investigations, queries our security data lake, writes code to fix issues—and remembers what it learns. Here's how we cut alert time-to-resolution by 71% and fundamentally changed how our on-call engineers work. Share How we secure Figma’s internal systems with agents Illustrations by Jimmy Simpson When it comes to protecting our internal platforms, the threats we defend against on Figm

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. Trail of Bits Blog

    Trail of Bits 如何用 Codex 的 /goal 在 Patch the Planet 中找漏洞

    Trail of Bits 分享了在 Patch the Planet 项目中用 Codex 的 /goal 功能挖掘开源软件漏洞的三条经验:让 Codex 自己写目标提示词、只定义结果不规定路径、每个智能体只分配一个目标。团队把威胁模型文件作为目标提示词的核心输入,并指出把找漏洞和覆盖率放进同一个提示词会导致优化不均,改为先让 Codex 找出五个最有希望的攻击面,再为每个攻击面单独开一个 /goal 会话。工程师 Kevin Valerio 基于 /goal 搭建了针对 Rust 编译器的自动化变体分析流水线,所有提交给 Patch the Planet 的 Rust 漏洞都出自该系统。

    “Figure 3: Rust maintainers assumed we had a team of engineers working on finding bugs. It was just one engineer with a strong handle on Codex’s /goal.”

    Trail of Bits July 28, 2026 open-source , vulnerabilities , machine-learning Page content 1. Let Codex write the goal 2. Define the outcome, not the path 3. Assign one outcome per agent Where human judgment is needed Codex’s /goal feature amplifies bug hunting, but getting good results requires the right prompt, the right scope, and the right number of outcomes per run. For Patch the Planet , our joint initiative with OpenAI to find and fix bugs in open-source software, we pointed Codex at some

    匹配字段正文

  2. Cartesia 产品与研究

    Cartesia 解析如何判断 TTS 模型是否真正优秀

    Cartesia 发布技术博客,系统拆解 TTS 模型评测的多维挑战,指出 WER 饱和、上下文正确性、文本归一化、自动质量分数局限、人工评测偏差、长音频与流式失败模式、领域差异及多语言难点。文章强调 TTS 质量不是单一维度,需按产品体验构建多维评测,并介绍了 Cartesia 在低延迟、清晰度、自然表达、上下文正确性、一致性和流式鲁棒性上的优化方向。

    sounds to humans WER is a necessary metric for many use cases, especially those involving alphanumerics that are not words. But WER is rarely sufficient for enterprise-grade voice agents. 3. Contextual correctness is another challenge Many errors require semantic disambiguation to even define correctness: “read” (present vs past); “lead” (metal vs verb); “Polish” (nationality vs verb); “bass” (fish vs instrument); “live” (verb vs adjective); years like “2026” (twenty-twenty-six vs two thousand t

    匹配字段正文

星期日

  1. Together AI Blog

    Together AI 对比 Kimi K3 与 GPT-5.6 Sol 在 DeepSWE 上的表现与路由策略

    Together AI 在 DeepSWE 上对比 Kimi K3 与 GPT-5.6 Sol:Sol 以 72.7% 拿下 pass@1,Kimi K3 以 89.4% 拿下 pass@4,且每次 rollout 成本 4.65 美元对 8.37 美元。两者逐任务相关性仅 0.46、失败方式不同,先用 Kimi K3 再在测试套件拒绝时升级到 Sol 的级联可达约 85.6%,高于任一单模型和完美一次性路由的 83.4%。两者合计覆盖 113 个任务中的 108 个,剩余 5 个需引入第三个模型。

    (pass@1 72.7% vs 68.5%) and solves more tasks four-for-four. Kimi K3 wins pass@2 and pass@4 and costs far less, so it is the stronger value pick for high-volume or retry-tolerant agent work. For most teams the best answer is to route between them. In our run, Kimi K3 cost \$4.65 per rollout versus \$8.37 for GPT-5.6 Sol, a little over half the price. Measured per solved task, Kimi K3 returned 14.7 solves per \$100 against Sol's 5.3, about 2.8x the work per dollar. Yes, if you can verify results

    匹配字段正文

星期五

  1. Anthropic:Claude.dev 开发者博客精选

    Claude 5 代模型的上下文工程新规则

    Anthropic 总结了面向 Claude 5 代模型和 Claude Code 的上下文工程方法,称其删减超过 80% 的 Claude Code 系统提示词后,编码评测未出现可测量的损失。新方法强调让模型运用判断、设计更具表达力的工具接口,并通过 Skills、延迟加载工具和文件树渐进披露上下文。Claude Code 还提供 claude doctor,可用 /doctor 精简 Skills 和 CLAUDE.md 文件。

    One assembled context holding a system prompt line “leave documentation as appropriate”, a skill line “do not add comments”, and a user request “just make it work like the old one”.

    We removed over 80% of Claude Code's system prompt for more advanced models. How to apply the lessons we learned to your own context engineering in Claude Code and with your own agents. I’ve written previously about how to best prompt the newest generation of Claude 5 models and work with them iteratively to discover what you want to build. But when you send a message to Claude, the prompt is only a small part of the context it gets. Much of your context is assembled from your system prompt, Ski

    匹配字段正文

  2. Together AI Blog

    Together AI 对比 Kimi K3 与 Claude Fable 5 的 DeepSWE 编码表现与成本

    Together AI 在 DeepSWE 基准上对比 Kimi K3 与 Claude Fable 5:Fable 5 在 xhigh 设置下 pass@1 为 69.9%,Kimi K3 max 为 68.5%,但 Kimi K3 在 pass@2(82.0 对 80.2)和 pass@4(89.4% 对 88.5%)上反超。成本方面,Kimi K3 每次 rollout 为 4.65 美元,Fable 5 为 13.41 美元,每 100 美元分别完成 14.7 与 5.3 个任务。Kimi K3 是 Moonshot AI 的开源权重模型,可自托管或通过推理服务商部署。

    (pass@1 69.9% vs 68.5%) and solves more tasks four-for-four. Kimi K3 wins pass@2 and pass@4 and costs far less, so it is the stronger value pick for high volume or retry-tolerant agent work. In our run, Kimi K3 cost \$4.65 per rollout versus \$13.41 for Claude Fable 5 at its xhigh setting, roughly a third of the price. Measured per solved task, Kimi K3 returned 14.7 solves per \$100 against Fable's 5.3, about 2.8x the work per dollar. Yes. Kimi K3 is an open-weight model from Moonshot AI, so on

    匹配字段正文

星期六

  1. Ahead of AI

    如何控制大语言模型的推理力度

    文章解释了大语言模型如何通过不同推理力度,在回答质量、token 消耗、成本和延迟之间进行权衡。其实现通常结合混合 SFT 数据、按模式调整的 RL 奖励、长度惩罚、独立专家模型或硬性 token 预算;DeepSeek V4、Nemotron 3 Ultra、Kimi K3、GLM-5、Qwen3 和 Inkling 采用了不同组合。模型规模与推理力度是两套独立控制方式,较小模型提高推理力度有时可达到与较大模型降低推理力度相近的基准成绩。

    ected token budget, its reward is instead set to -1. This gives the model a strong incentive to stay within the budget. (The exact reward setup is different for non-verifiable and agentic tasks, and Kimi also uses learned reward models and pairwise comparisons.) To have Kimi K3 support the three reasoning effort modes, the training looked as follows. First, the researchers start by training a max-effort version (“specialist”) with a relatively generous budget. They then lower the budget to train

    匹配字段正文

星期五

  1. Hugging Face

    PyTorch 性能分析(第三部分):剖析注意力后端

    本文通过 PyTorch Profiler 对比朴素注意力与 SDPA 的 math、efficient、flash 和 cuDNN 后端,揭示不同实现的执行开销。原地 masked_fill_ 可在无梯度前向中消除一次 Memcpy;math 后端因 FP32 转换、重复构造掩码等操作启动 20 个 GPU kernel,慢 3.7 倍,而其余后端将计算融合为单个 kernel。测试形状下 FlashAttention-2 最快,其低占用率源于大量使用片上资源,并不代表优化不佳。

    w go profile something. 🤗 Thanks to Noe Flandre for their reviews on the early draft of the post! The blog post was polished using an LLM. This in no way means that we have let an agent run in the background and let it generate the blog. Some of us in the team are non-english speakers and think LLMs (which are mostly trained in the English Language) can rectify silly grammar mistakes or rephrase sentences that sound less intimidating and cleaner. Hope this helps with the idea of "why should I re

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. Hugging Face精选

    PRX 第4部分:我们的数据策略

    Photoroom 为 7B 文生图模型 PRX 构建了兼顾规模与多样性的预训练数据管线,以 Lance 完成探索和整理,再转换为 MDS 供分布式训练。团队用 Qwen3-VL-8B 重新生成详细图像描述,并采用 quality 92 的 JPEG、分辨率与宽高比分桶。文本分类和感知哈希通过跳过列表过滤文本密集、NSFW 及近重复样本,无需重写数据集。

    ext • 10B • Updated Mar 2 • 9.28M • 2.08k xtuner/llava-llama-3-8b-v1 1 Image-Text-to-Text • 8B • Updated Apr 28, 2024 • 34 • 120 Spaces mentioned in this article 1 Running on Zero Agents Featured 37 PRX Pixel 📷 37 Public test Space for pixel-space PRX t2i Collections mentioned in this article 1 Qwen3-VL 782 More from this author PRX Part 3 — Training a Text-to-Image Model in 24h! 69 March 3, 2026 Training Design for Text-to-Image Models: Lessons from Ablations 77 February 3, 2026 Community Thank

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Trail of Bits Blog

    GPT-5.5-Cyber 一天内为 zlib 搭建模糊测试实验室

    Trail of Bits 在 Patch the Planet 项目中用 Codex 的 /goal 命令驱动 GPT-5.5-Cyber,一天内为 zlib 搭建了覆盖十余个入口的模糊测试流程,包括 harness、sanitizer 构建和种子,并发现多个待协调披露的漏洞。模型自行判断静态审查价值有限,转而构建动态测试工具,并主动放弃一个在真实条件下难以触发的 inflateBack 空回调崩溃。作者认为,定制化模糊测试的专家门槛正在消失,攻防双方都能更快发现漏洞。

    was real, but reaching it required a caller to set up a state that was extraordinarily unlikely in real-world conditions, so the model logged it as unreachable and moved on. This agent kept going without human intervention and found several higher-impact issues. That discipline is the whole game. The value of the zlib harness came from automation plus a strict definition of what counted as a reportable finding . Without strong validity rules baked into the goal and a model truly capable of eval

    匹配字段正文

  2. LMSYS Blog

    LMSYS 分享 SGLang 智能体辅助开发实践:从 SKILL 到 SOTA 循环

    LMSYS 发布博客,介绍 SGLang 智能体辅助开发的初步探索,把 CUDA 崩溃调试、内核集成、测试、CI、性能剖析、生产排障等仓库级流程写成可执行的 SKILL.md 与脚本。文中给出 llm-torch-profiler-analysis 与 llm-pipeline-analysis 两个剖析技能,前者输出 kernel、overlap、fuse 三类固定表格,后者按前向传播与层拆分 trace。基于 KDA-Pilot 的 10 个 B200 扩散内核任务中,多数在提取的生产行上取得 1.1341x 至 2.7499x 的 wall-geomean 加速,截至 2026 年 6 月 27 日已有三个优化合入 SGLang 上游。

    Contents 1. TL;DR; 2. Why SGLang Is a Good Fit for Agent-Assisted Development; 3. From Prompt Engineering to SKILL: Protocols and Examples; 3.1 Current Skill Stack; 3.2 Recent Optimization and Workflow Examples; 4. Profiling, Review, and Loop Engineering; 4.1 Humanize/RLCR: Adding External Review to the Loop; 4.2 SGLang SOTA Performance Loop (Loop Engineering); 4.3 Codex Goal: A Lower-Cost Loop Implementation; 5. KDA-Based CUDA Kernel Optimization for SGLang Systems; 6. Practice Rules; 7. Acknow

    匹配字段正文

星期二

  1. Air Street Press

    ElevenLabs 工程师解析如何缓解 AI 推理算力短缺

    ElevenLabs 研究工程师 Angelos Perivolaropoulos 介绍了如何通过标准工程优化,将语音推理的单 GPU 服务能力从 1 名用户提升至 70 名,架构级改造则可达到约 140 名。连续批处理、FP8 量化、多 token 预测和经蒸馏适配的 FP8 KV cache 是主要手段,其中 KV cache 缩小 2.5x 后,吞吐量从 28 名用户增至 70 名。各项技术会引入延迟、内存上限或质量损失,实际选择取决于具体工作负载。

    are subsidized, by one audience estimate a factor of ten to forty. Angelos’s hope is that optimization, not subsidy, eventually closes that gap. The largest models, he said, have to be subsidized to make economic sense, but he expects smaller, Sonnet-class models to become good enough for nearly all everyday use, at margins that actually work. He already sees the shape of it in agent systems: route each request to the smallest model that can handle it, and reserve the expensive one for planning.

    匹配字段正文

星期六

  1. Ahead of AI精选

    Sebastian Raschka:如何用开源工具搭建本地编码智能体

    Sebastian Raschka 演示了如何用 Ollama、本地开放权重 LLM 和 Qwen-Code 搭建可读写文件、运行命令并验证修改的本地编码智能体。文章还介绍了安全审计、性能测试及 Codex、Claude Code 的接入方式;其小规模评测中,Codex 使用更少 token,而 Claude Code 在部分模型组合上取得更高任务成功率。

    Many people reached out to me in the past asking about my local agent stack as well as how I set up my local agent stack. So, I thought it might be useful to put together a little tutorial on how to set up a local (coding) agent using open-source tools and open-weight LLMs. This article is a tutorial on setting up a production-ready coding agent with a fully local stack. We will use a locally served LLM together with a local coding harness that can read files, make edits, run commands, and verif

    匹配字段正文

星期四

  1. Air Street Press精选

    Revolut 如何规模化运行 AI

    Revolut 通过统一网关和按 AI 用例治理的控制层,在受监管的银行环境中运行生成式 AI,并为每个生成式产品设置模型回退链。其平台支撑的生成式用例约为传统机器学习用例的两倍,按任务选择满足要求的较小模型可将成本最多降低 8 倍且不损失质量。语音服务已覆盖 20 个国家、每月处理约 25,000 通电话,AIR 则结合交易数据分析支出并回答金融相关问题。

    sponse comes back in under two seconds. It now runs in 20 countries, handles around 25,000 calls a month, and resolves a customer’s problem roughly eight times faster than a human agent. AIR, the latest layer, followed in Q2 2025 and pulls in transactional data: it can break down your spending, propose hotels inside a budget computed from your own history, or explain why a stock is moving. Across the arc from the old chatbot to today, the share of cases resolved without a human climbed from 17%

    匹配字段正文

星期一

  1. Browser Use

    Browser Use 如何把云浏览器成本降到三分之一并加快启动

    Browser Use 重建了云浏览器基础设施,把每个浏览器会话从每小时 0.06 美元降到 0.02 美元,并让新会话在 1 秒内启动。它改用 Firecracker 在普通 EC2 上为每个会话运行独立微型 VM,通过 2MB 大页、自定义 userfaultfd 处理等把恢复 VM 到可接受命令的时间从 9.8 秒降到 3.1 秒,页错误处理次数从约 10 万次降到约 1100 次。VM 冷启动低于 400ms,公开 API 的浏览器创建延迟为 p50 825ms、p99 1.35s,该基础设施已上线。

    Browser Use: how we made cloud browsers 3x cheaper — every browser is its own Firecracker microVM on regular EC2, at $0.02 per browser hour with sub-400ms VM cold start and headless stealth.

    oom. That machine restores a saved browser VM, starts Chromium inside it, waits until Chromium is ready to be controlled, and returns a connection URL. That URL is what the user's agent connects to. Browser Use controls Chromium over a WebSocket using the Chrome DevTools Protocol, or CDP. CDP is the remote-control API for Chrome: click this button, type this text, read this page, take this screenshot. Three things made this take longer: restoring the VM's memory, launching Chromium, and keeping

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. Linear:Now

    Linear 如何在 AI 智能体时代审查代码

    Linear 介绍了团队如何使用 Diffs 应对 AI 智能体带来的代码评审量增长,将评审重点从逐行查错转向判断改动是否解决正确的问题。1 月至 3 月,其创建的 issue 总数和合并的 PR 数量均增长 50%。评审者可结合需求背景、预览构建、引导式 diff 和内置智能体处理反馈,并把更多时间用于边界情况、用户体验和替代方案。

    Abstract image showing connected nodes.

    about why we built the feature and how we use it ourselves today. Like a lot of people who build software, I felt the ground shift at the start of 2026. The models got better, the agents got better with them, and almost overnight the amount of code moving through my team went up. Between January and March our total issues created and PRs merged both climbed by 50%. That was exciting, and it was also a problem. With that much code moving, I felt the pull to “looks good!” my way through reviews ju

    匹配字段正文

  2. Browser Use精选

    Claude Fable 5 在 BU Bench 拿下 80% 高分

    Browser Use 用开源 Browser Use 库在 BU Bench V1 上测试 Anthropic 的 Claude Fable 5,得分 80.0%,比第二名 GPT 5.5 高出 12 分。100 个任务中通过 80 个,20 个失败里 16 个判定错误、4 个触发 30 分钟超时,平均每任务耗时 6 分 53 秒,100 个任务 API 成本为 580.87 美元。Fable 的失败主要来自提取错误事实或选错实体、无法充分访问或搜索来源、答案缺乏轨迹支撑,与 GPT 5.5 常因多步骤任务未完成而失败的模式不同。

    ng a high score, it bested the next-highest model, GPT 5.5, by 12 points. The result came at an exorbitant price: $580.87 in API cost for 100 tasks. BU Bench tests whether browser agents can complete real web tasks. It requires agents to handle multi-step navigation, search, information extraction, form filling, dynamic UI interactions, iframes, PDFs, downloaded files, and synthesis across live websites. Its tasks, code, and model scores are available here. Below is Claude Fable 5 compared to ot

    匹配字段正文

星期三

  1. Anthropic:Claude.dev 开发者博客精选

    Anthropic 构建 Claude Code 的经验:如何设计和使用技能

    Anthropic 总结了内部构建和扩展数百个 Claude Code 技能的经验,将其归纳为九类,并介绍设计、分发、组合与衡量方法。团队发现产品验证类技能对 Claude 输出质量的改善最易衡量,而高质量技能应突出易错点,利用文件系统渐进披露上下文,并通过脚本、配置和按需 hooks 提升可靠性。

    A three-by-three grid of skill categories with example skill names: Library and API Reference, Product Verification, Data and Analysis, Business Automation, Scaffolding and Templates, Code Quality and Review, CI/CD and Deployment, Incident Runbooks, Infrastructure Ops.

    type of skills are worth making? How do you structure a skill? When do you share them with others? WHAT ARE SKILLS? Skills are folders of instructions, scripts, and resources that agents can discover and use to do things more accurately and efficiently. This blog post assumes familiarity with skills basics; if you’re new, start with our Introduction to agent skills course on Skilljar. A common misconception we hear about skills is that they are “just markdown files.” They’re actually folders tha

    匹配字段正文

星期五

  1. Together AI Blog精选

    Together AI 如何构建全球最快的语音转文字技术栈

    Together AI 优化 ASR 全链路,使 NVIDIA Parakeet-TDT 0.6B v3 可在不到 10 秒内转录约 20 小时语音,并与 OpenAI Whisper Large v3 一同成为 Artificial Analysis 排名中延迟最低的两款模型。其方案采用多配置 TensorRT、条件 CUDA 图、Unix 域套接字、共享内存和 epoll,解码器提速 2–3 倍。通过 gc.freeze() 排除预分配对象的 GC 扫描后,约 200 ms 的 p95 延迟尖峰也随之消失。

    fic patterns. The lesson was to keep profiling beyond the model. GPU time, queue depth, and model execution all looked normal; the latency spike lived in the Python runtime. Voice agents usually run as a cascade: ASR produces a transcript, an LLM generates the response, and TTS produces audio. ASR is the first stage in that path, so its latency and jitter set the earliest bound on user-visible response time. The optimizations above target different parts of that path. TensorRT multi-profile engi

    匹配字段正文