English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
←Search results
Search “Agents”
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
Legora uses Modal Sandboxes to run 2,000 agent evaluations in parallel
On October 19, 2026, the official Modal engineering blog published a post introducing that Legora places each evaluation run in an independent Modal Sandbox; a single experiment can run more than 2,000 times in parallel, used to test legal agents that span thousands of documents and run for several hours. The team uses Modal Volumes to snapshot documents, databases, and permission states, and by building images hourly and pre-warming Sandboxes, shortens reset-to-commit from a full build to an incremental update. After migrating to Modal VM Sandboxes, Docker works inside the sandbox like an ordinary Linux host, and Legora removed all of its previous network and FUSE workarounds.
Matched fieldsTitle
View story:Legora uses Modal Sandboxes to run 2,000 agent evaluations in parallel
Vercel AI Gateway provides a unified view of agent sessions
On October 19, 2026, Vercel AI Gateway provides a unified session view across personal and coding agents, apps, and API keys. According to the Vercel developer account, AI Gateway logs can now show each agent session, group requests by conversation, and display cost, cache hit rate, and the agent that executed the session; session affinity pins each session to the provider where its prompt cache resides. Guillermo Rauch reposted and praised this unified view, saying it covers personal and coding agents, apps, and API keys, and emphasized that Vercel AI Gateway gives users control over model choice, data (ZDR), and the metadata used to understand RoI. There are currently no follow-up developments.
Matched fieldsTitle
View story:Vercel AI Gateway provides a unified Agent session view
Legora uses Modal Sandboxes to run 2,000 agent evaluations in parallel
On October 19, 2026, the official Modal engineering blog published a post introducing that Legora places each evaluation run in an independent Modal Sandbox; a single experiment can run more than 2,000 times in parallel, used to test legal agents that span thousands of documents and run for several hours. The team uses Modal Volumes to snapshot documents, databases, and permission states, and by building images hourly and pre-warming Sandboxes, shortens reset-to-commit from a full build to an incremental update. After migrating to Modal VM Sandboxes, Docker works inside the sandbox like an ordinary Linux host, and Legora removed all of its previous network and FUSE workarounds.
lished a post introducing that Legora places each evaluation run in an independent Modal Sandbox; a single experiment can run more than 2,000 times in parallel, used to test legal agents that span thousands of documents and run for several hours. The team uses Modal Volumes to snapshot documents, databases, and permission states, and by building images hourly and pre-warming Sandboxes, shortens reset-to-commit from a full build to an incremental update. After migrating to Modal VM Sandboxes, Doc
Matched fieldsTitle
Lauren proposes two cognitive divides regarding Agents
On October 17, 2026, lauren asked: Is chat the ultimate form of AI agent UI? and invited everyone to share their reasons. On October 19, lauren launched a poll on the same question, and about 70% of respondents answered "no"; she believes the disagreement lies in two imaginings: one sees agents as an extension of one's own mind, and in the future brain-computer interfaces may eliminate the need for an input box; the other sees agents as independent beings capable of making decisions autonomously and working alongside us. She also believes that voice and text chat are essentially the same, both treating the agent as an "other" to converse with. On the same day, swyx responded in the dialogue style of the Bhagavad Gita, saying that people on X always think they are the first to want to end chat, and that people say they want to end chat but in fact return to it in even greater numbers; what they truly desire is not truth but "newness." The discussion currently revolves around this question.
Matched fieldsTitle
View story:lauren asks whether chat is the ultimate form of Agent UI
Vercel AI Gateway provides a unified Agent session view
On October 19, 2026, Vercel AI Gateway provides a unified session view across personal and coding agents, apps, and API keys. According to the Vercel developer account, AI Gateway logs can now show each agent session, group requests by conversation, and display cost, cache hit rate, and the agent that executed the session; session affinity pins each session to the provider where its prompt cache resides. Guillermo Rauch reposted and praised this unified view, saying it covers personal and coding agents, apps, and API keys, and emphasized that Vercel AI Gateway gives users control over model choice, data (ZDR), and the metadata used to understand RoI. There are currently no follow-up developments.
On October 19, 2026, Vercel AI Gateway provides a unified session view across personal and coding agents, apps, and API keys. According to the Vercel developer account, AI Gateway logs can now show each agent session, group requests by conversation, and display cost, cache hit rate, and the agent that executed the session; session affinity pins each session to the provider where its prompt cache resides. Guillermo Rauch reposted and praised this unified view, saying it covers personal and coding
Matched fieldsTitle
The author announced that the practical experience had been compiled into "Eight Lectures on Agent Engineering in Practice"
On October 18, 2026, the author announced that the practical experience had been compiled into "Eight Lectures on Agent Engineering in Practice". On the same day, the Tencent Cloud Developer Community published an introduction to the series, describing how it focuses on upgrading prototypes that can call models and tools into systems that can complete business tasks, explain failures, control costs, and iterate continuously. The introduction states that the entire series runs through two fictional teaching cases—a case-filing assistant Agent and a postoperative follow-up Agent—covering eight topics: task contracts, reasoning and collaboration, context and memory, reliable tool execution, observability and replay, evaluation and calibration, security boundaries, and production operations; the text emphasizes that a model being able to suggest the next step does not mean the system can deliver business results, and that the example fields, budgets, and figures are all teaching calculations and do not constitute legal advice. Currently, only the introduction to the series has been published, and no factual evidence has yet been seen for the content of the subsequent lectures.
On October 18, 2026, the author announced that the practical experience had been compiled into "Eight Lectures on Agent Engineering in Practice". On the same day, the Tencent Cloud Developer Community published an introduction to the series, describing how it focuses on upgrading prototypes that can call models and tools into systems that can complete business tasks, explain failures, control costs, and iterate continuously. The introduction states that the entire series runs through two fiction
Matched fieldsTitle
The author announces that practical experience has been compiled into "Eight Lessons on Agent Engineering in Practice"
On October 18, 2026, the author announced that the practical experience had been compiled into "Eight Lectures on Agent Engineering in Practice". On the same day, the Tencent Cloud Developer Community published an introduction to the series, describing how it focuses on upgrading prototypes that can call models and tools into systems that can complete business tasks, explain failures, control costs, and iterate continuously. The introduction states that the entire series runs through two fictional teaching cases—a case-filing assistant Agent and a postoperative follow-up Agent—covering eight topics: task contracts, reasoning and collaboration, context and memory, reliable tool execution, observability and replay, evaluation and calibration, security boundaries, and production operations; the text emphasizes that a model being able to suggest the next step does not mean the system can deliver business results, and that the example fields, budgets, and figures are all teaching calculations and do not constitute legal advice. Currently, only the introduction to the series has been published, and no factual evidence has yet been seen for the content of the subsequent lectures.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
Lauren proposes a four-layer inverted pyramid framework for trusting Agents
On October 17, 2026, Lauren (@poteto) of the Grok Bot team proposed a four-layer inverted pyramid framework for trusting the work output of AI Agents, arguing that the most effort should go into transforming the codebase itself rather than disciplining the Agent. The framework is divided into four layers in decreasing order of investment: codebase improvements (architecture, types and invariants, module boundaries), static analysis (Lint, tests, CI, TLA+ and other forms of formal verification), textual guidance (comments, AGENTS.md, Skills descriptions), and human review. She believes that the higher the layer, the more deterministic and token-efficient the approach; the lower the layer, the more it relies on the Agent's unreliable understanding and on human effort that is hard to scale, and that prompts themselves are only a third-tier means. On the same day, another report introduced the framework under the name Lauren Tan and suggested handing the original post to one's own bot or agent, giving steps to install the tool, create a new Project, and use commands such as /recall, /poteto-mode, /correct, and /architect to analyze historical commits and feedback. At present, the framework is still in the proposal and dissemination stage, with no subsequent implementation or effectiveness data yet.
On October 17, 2026, Lauren (@poteto) of the Grok Bot team proposed a four-layer inverted pyramid framework for trusting the work output of AI Agents, arguing that the most effort should go into transforming the codebase itself rather than disciplining the Agent. The framework is divided into four layers in decreasing order of investment: codebase improvements (architecture, types and invariants, module boundaries), static analysis (Lint, tests, CI, TLA+ and other forms of formal verification),
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
Lauren proposes a four-layer inverted pyramid framework for trusting Agents
On October 17, 2026, Lauren (@poteto) of the Grok Bot team proposed a four-layer inverted pyramid framework for trusting the work output of AI Agents, arguing that the most effort should go into transforming the codebase itself rather than disciplining the Agent. The framework is divided into four layers in decreasing order of investment: codebase improvements (architecture, types and invariants, module boundaries), static analysis (Lint, tests, CI, TLA+ and other forms of formal verification), textual guidance (comments, AGENTS.md, Skills descriptions), and human review. She believes that the higher the layer, the more deterministic and token-efficient the approach; the lower the layer, the more it relies on the Agent's unreliable understanding and on human effort that is hard to scale, and that prompts themselves are only a third-tier means. On the same day, another report introduced the framework under the name Lauren Tan and suggested handing the original post to one's own bot or agent, giving steps to install the tool, create a new Project, and use commands such as /recall, /poteto-mode, /correct, and /architect to analyze historical commits and feedback. At present, the framework is still in the proposal and dissemination stage, with no subsequent implementation or effectiveness data yet.
Matched fieldsTitle
View story:Lauren proposes a four-layer inverted pyramid framework for trusting Agents
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsTitle
English translation is being prepared.
On October 17, 2026, lauren asked: Is chat the ultimate form of AI agent UI? and invited everyone to share their reasons. On October 19, lauren launched a poll on the same question, and about 70% of respondents answered "no"; she believes the disagreement lies in two imaginings: one sees agents as an extension of one's own mind, and in the future brain-computer interfaces may eliminate the need for an input box; the other sees agents as independent beings capable of making decisions autonomously and working alongside us. She also believes that voice and text chat are essentially the same, both treating the agent as an "other" to converse with. On the same day, swyx responded in the dialogue style of the Bhagavad Gita, saying that people on X always think they are the first to want to end chat, and that people say they want to end chat but in fact return to it in even greater numbers; what they truly desire is not truth but "newness." The discussion currently revolves around this question.
Matched fieldsTitle
View story:lauren asks whether chat is the ultimate form of Agent UI