Dario writes a long post responding to Anthropic safety questions
In October 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario published a long post on X responding to outside doubts about Anthropic's stance on safety. According to Phoenix Technology, he was responding to questions raised by AI safety investigator Nathan Calvin, and for the first time disclosed that the company had already trained a high-end model at the Mythos level as early as February this year; because its cybersecurity defense mechanisms were not yet complete, it was released only to a very small number of partners, and was not opened to the public until the safety guardrails were in place in June, a gap of about four months. He also listed the costs the company had voluntarily borne for safety, including a large number of false positives caused by biological risk filtering, pushing for legislation such as California SB 53, and a plan to contribute 5% of the company's shares to a public interest fund. Dario said this approach amounts to competing toward a higher standard, while Calvin questioned how much more safety can make the company concede in the race. Other reports said the long post was responding to a list of nine questions raised by outside safety researchers, who questioned that Anthropic had departed from its original safety mission and become a commercial machine sprinting toward a $2 trillion IPO.
In October 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario published a long post on X responding to outside doubts about Anthropic's stance on safety. According to Phoenix Technology, he was responding to questions raised by AI safety investigator Nathan Calvin, and for the first time disclosed that the company had already trained a high-end model at the Mythos level as early as February this year; because its cybersecurity defense mechanisms were not yet complete, it was released only to a very small number of partn
Matched fieldsTitle