Microsoft and City University of Hong Kong propose Taste-Bench to evaluate agent decision-making
Researchers from Microsoft and City University of Hong Kong have built Taste-Bench to evaluate the long-term decision-making capabilities of AI agents on long tasks. The benchmark contains 502 binary-choice questions. According to The Decoder, the best-performing model, GPT-5.6 Sol, achieved an average accuracy of only 59.7%, while GPT-5.5 reached 59.5%. When key clues only become apparent after a large amount of subsequent work, the average accuracy of all models drops to 21%, close to random guessing, and increasing the reasoning budget brings almost no improvement. The researchers also distilled the teacher model's judgments using Qwen3.6-27B as the base model; the student's accuracy on unseen tasks rose from 30% to 47.9%, and its success rate on 41 SWE-bench Pro tasks increased from 14.6% to 33.7%.
Researchers from Microsoft and City University of Hong Kong have built Taste-Bench to evaluate the long-term decision-making capabilities of AI agents on long tasks. The benchmark contains 502 binary-choice questions. According to The Decoder, the best-performing model, GPT-5.6 Sol, achieved an average accuracy of only 59.7%, while GPT-5.5 reached 59.5%. When key clues only become apparent after a large amount of subsequent work, the average accuracy of all models drops to 21%, close to random g
Matched fieldsSummary