English translation is being prepared.
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
At The Curve conference held in Berkeley, several speakers proposed that limits should be considered on the level of intelligence large language models can reach; depending on how strict the limits are, this could amount to a de facto ban on superintelligence. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has called for "some kind of speed limit" on recursive self-improvement, but any such limit would require enforcement capabilities that do not currently exist.

Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Nathan Lambert argues that the current debate over the online risks of open models has reached a stalemate: although Anthropic's report on GLM-5.3 as an offensive cyber tool is technically sound, it sidesteps key questions such as "what would happen if open models were banned" and "why do Chinese companies believe it is safe to release them." He points out that most recorded cyberattacks to date have been carried out by closed models, and that if open-weight models were banned on cyber-risk grounds, it might also be necessary to ban public APIs for frontier closed models.
Nathan Lambert argues that the current debate over the online risks of open models has reached a stalemate: although Anthropic's report on GLM-5.3 as an offensive cyber tool is technically sound, it sidesteps key questions such as "what would happen if open models were banned" and "why do Chinese companies believe it is safe to release them." He points out that most recorded cyberattacks to date have been carried out by closed models, and that if open-weight models were banned on cyber-risk grou
Matched fieldsBody

Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody
Matched fieldsBody