纽约时报等出版方起诉 Brave 浏览器抓取内容训练 AI 并绕过付费墙
The New York Times sues Brave web browser for AI scraping and bypassing paywalls
《纽约时报》及多家出版方对 Brave 浏览器背后的公司提起诉讼，指控其未经许可抓取内容用于训练 AI，并让用户绕过付费墙。起诉书称 Brave 从未请求出版方许可，其浏览器还以“Paywall blocker”功能宣传可访问“数百家顶级出版方”。Perplexity 首席传播官 Jesse Dwyer 向 The Verge 回应称《纽约时报》在律师上花得过多、在记者身上花得太少。
推荐理由
AI 评分 63
诉讼把浏览器抓取训练与绕过付费墙放在同一案由里，读者可据此了解内容方与AI公司的新一轮版权交锋。
主题
正文
The New York Times and a group of other publications have filed lawsuits against the company that makes the Brave web browser over alleged unlawful scraping to train AI and also letting users bypass their paywalls, as reported by Reuters .
Brave also promotes “hundreds of top publishers” as being accessible through its “Paywall blocker” feature in its browser.
“Brave has never asked for the Publishers’ permission to access their websites, much less to copy the material and provide it to users or other AI companies,” the complaint says. “On the contrary, as noted above, Brave allows its users to bypass the Publishers’ paywalls without
Brave, Anthropic, Mistral, SpaceXSI, and Cohere, didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment. “ The New York Times is overpaying its attorneys and underpaying its journalists. (Who could’ve easily identified the disinformation in this suit.)” Jesse Dwyer, Perplexity’s chief communications officer, says in a statement to The Verge .